Happy Hour


Free chaos
January 2, 2008, 11:43 pm
Filed under: Daily Specials | Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Tonight’s drink: vodka and olive juice.

The woman’s monthly dip in hormones can be a blessing and a curse. For some, it may put a cramp in evening activities, or even daily activities for the extra plagued. It has an influence on wardrobe choices, and whether or not she is pissed at herself for deciding to wait until next weekend to do laundry. In fact, it influences whether or not she is pissed off at a lot of things, and can even prompt her to call ex-lovers and stop protecting them from the things she always wanted to tell them. Or, it can be the catalyst for the explosive realizations she has about current lovers, and the domino effect those can produce. There is less patience, less inhibition, perhaps even less tact. There is more justification for eating cookies for dinner, having another glass of wine, or crying while listening to the same song over and over again.

I was craving a writing prompt this evening, along with the rest of the Nutter Butters in my kitchen. In answer to the first craving, I reverted back to an October blog of Jenn’s which, in turn, was a play off a Chris Brogan blog post about 100 topics he wanted others to write about. Obviously, I am not as into the thick of social media as others, so I can’t relate to about 80% of them. However, I found two that seemed to play off of eachother right now in my life – numbers 51 and 93: “The Art of Chaos” and “Giving It Away.”

The art of creating chaos starts with disorder – stepping out of line and going straight to the front. Cutting corners and skipping steps takes away the infrastructure that the rest of the world depends upon to get through the day in an orderly fashion. You grow up in this world, and make social faux pas as you learn civility, because it isn’t animal nature to get in line and wait your turn to meet your needs. An infant sees a toy and grabs it for his own, and he has to learn how to share, and to play nice with others.

Civility exists to reign in our animalistic behaviors of self-serving competition so that we all obtain what we need to survive. In that sense, giving it away is a subtle though surefire way to start a little chaos both inside and outside of civilization. In the animal world, freebies go against the rule of competition, and dismantle things like evolution and food chains. Within society, freebies create a disincentive to contribute to the common good. Both situations could feasibly lead to chaos.

Even though giving things away can create chaos amongst the people, it seems civility creates little pools of chaos within people, because it sort of replaces one set of rules for another manufactured set that is contradictory to our instincts. It is within us to lay claim, and civility sort of suppresses that. Instead of relying on our strengths and accomplishments to not only survive but thrive, we have to depend on eachother and on the surrounding systems to tell us whether or not we have earned the life we seek.

I’m not suggesting that civility is bad – just that it sort of explains why we all feel like we are going a little crazy inside. You have these urges inside that you’ve been conditioned to fight, and the little struggles cause confusion in the backdrop of your everyday. The parallels to love, sex, hate, hunger, justice, etc. are easy to make, but what does it mean?

It means that hormones or no, just roll with it – and maybe, don’t get caught.



Money, honey

Tonight’s drink: Veramonte Merlot.

I finally, FINALLY, caught up on my sleep last night. I left work early, unpacked my crap, tidied up the apartment, changed my sheets, and went directly to bed. At 6 p.m. Sometimes, I just have to hate my job.

The full night’s sleep has given me the wherewithal to finish a post that I had been thinking a lot about last week, but couldn’t quite gather the piquancy and the punch I needed to really make it happen. Just in time for a Friday, though, I have a nice glass of wine, a belly full of vinegar, and my Rockette heels on to bring you this next slice of my melon.

Last weekend, I got an add from a photographer on myspace who is quite obviously, and quite persistently, trying to book sessions during his upcoming trip to San Diego. It’s no secret that the main ingredient to his marketing campaign is to add women to his friends list, which is an age-old practice in consumer tactics. You appeal to someone’s sense of vanity to compel their consumption of your product.

Richard Netemeyer, et al, actually conducted a formal research on this subject, and published Trait Aspects of Vanity: Measurement and Relevance to Consumer Behavior. In this article, they sought to develop insights into vanity that would help those in marketing to most effectively target that powerful notion in selling their product. They came up with two basic definitions of vanity: Physical Vanity and Achievement Vanity. In both cases, the definitions state that vanity is either the excessive concern for, and/or positive (perhaps inflated) view of one’s [appearance/achievement].

The research itself isn’t so much compelling as it is affirming: people who have one or more strains of vanity, as defined above, were more likely to purchase products that promoted their cause. Those who highly regarded their appearance were apt to buy cosmetics and dieting products. Those who felt strongly about their image as an achiever were more inclined toward “conspicuous consumption” or, simply put, excess. You and I and Adam could probably come up with some basic eqautions that lead to this conclusion without the population studies – the more interesting part of this research to me has to do with the information they used to construct them.

In order to put together their sampling surveys for testing vanity, they drew from a number of standard social tools, one of them being the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. This tool would be used by counselors or mental health specialists as an assessment of one’s narcissism. Your answers to this test would determine whether or not your level of narcissism required behavioral counseling, especially if your behavior was acting as an impediment to normal social functioning.

At first glance, the questions on this test seem relatively predictable. “Modesty doesn’t become me” and “If I ruled the world, it would be a much better place” are easily identifiable as narcissistic in nature. But as you continue on, the “narcissistic” answers seem to be reflective of someone with basic self-confidence, such as “I will be a success” or “I am a good leader.”

The more I thought about it, the more I started to realize that some of the “narcissistic” answers sounded familiar. Like, the kinds of things you would hear in kindergarten, or from your family. Who hasn’t had someone tell them that they are as unique as a snowflake? Or that they could be whatever they wanted to be? Even watching Sesame Street, you hear these kinds of affirmations – statements of self-belief that you tell yourself in order to be successful and confident. Affirmations are the remedy of choice for those facing their all-time lows, or simply thinking they aren’t good enough.

Now, if we start life being taught to believe these things, the conspiracy theorist in me instantly thinks that society is shaping us into a bunch of vanity consumers. Suddenly, it makes perfect sense why the Western nations lead the world in consumerism. We’ve been spoon fed these ideas about being special and climbing the ladder, even in our humblest of moments. No wonder I want to buy makeup and eat really expensive ice cream when I get dumped – I feel like I’m pulling myself up by my Prada bootstraps.

The more reasonable side of me says that everyone needs to feel the glow of fabulosity at some point, regardless of how it is defined. It makes for a nice balance of down to earth and cloud nine. Should the Western world be criticized, then, because it makes velvet and gravy accessible to the middle class? If the lowest rung on the U.S. ladder is equivalent to the high of other countries, then where is the cardinal sin? We all need the dark and the light to remain in the gray, no matter how high the standards.

I truly don’t know. Until I decide, I’m going to pour myself another glass of wine, pluck my eyebrows, and anxiously await Jenn’s arrival this weekend.

It feels good to be queen. Even on a budget.



A la mode
November 8, 2007, 4:03 pm
Filed under: Daily Specials | Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Last night’s drinks: sake, vodka and sodas, kamikazes, and two sips of something with green tea liqour.

I’m accustomed to being humbled on a regular basis, and last night added another slice of that metaphorical pie to my plate. For those who don’t know me, the logical assumption would be that I have an inflated ego, with little to back it up -  similar to big-talking guys with slick pick-up lines, or divas lacking personality. However, I’ve found that my tendency toward this particular dessert is actually due to circumstances exactly opposite of those – that I have a deflated ego and I have a flood-gate full of things to share about myself.

The dynamics of this seem contradictory at first – how can you feel unimportant and continue to be humbled? Here is where I find that self-esteem is a tricky thing. Think about our big talking Mr. Slick for a second – anyone who’s taken even one psych class, or just listened to their mother give advice about bullies, probably has a sense that this guy talks himself up because he has low self-esteem. However, he can be humbled on his exterior, where the big ego lies, if he doesn’t live up to that image somehow. The same goes for someone like me, who maybe talks themself down a little because they have high self-esteem, but then surpasses that shy exterior by letting loose a little more.

In both cases, these characters can, and often are, seen as frauds because they’ve put up a front that’s suddenly lost some of its opacity.  In many cases, especially in the beginning stages of relationship building, this is not only a turn-off, but it is especially offensive, because the front comes across as a back-handed judgement on the other person in the conversation: “Why did this guy tell me he owned a Ferrari – do I look superficial?” or, “Why didn’t this girl want to talk about more cerebral things – did she think I was a mindless schmuck?”

From the backstage vantage point on these two characters, you can clearly see that they are simply still coming to grips with how to present themselves to people. But when you’re in the audience, this communication breakdown is an offense against your trust. People need to know what’s going on with those around them – it’s part self-preservation, and part social-creature. When someone messes around with the rules, they are suspect of impeding on both parts – as a predator or a psychopath. Obviously, neither of those two are fun to hang around.

So when you’re found out, you get called out, which is where the dessert service begins. It’d be great if we could all just be totally up front with eachother about who we are, where we’re coming from, and why Diet Pepsi beats Diet Coke any day, but society doesn’t work that way. Which is why there is always enough humble pie for everyone to take a slice.

As for the piece I’m currently forking through, I’m trying to really savor its particular flavor - the baker, in these matters, was quite the epicure.